Kibern. vyčisl. teh., 2015, Issue 179, pp 83-92.
Chernyshenko Sergei V., Dr (Biology), PhD (Phys. and Math.), Prof., Head of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Social Informatics of Khmelnytsky National University, st. Institutskaya, 11, Khmelnitsky, 29016, Ukraine, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Ruzich Roman V., Assistant of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Social Informatics of Khmelnitsky National University, st. Institutskaya, 11, Khmelnitsky, 29016, Ukraine, e-mail: email@example.com
DISCRETE EFFECTS IN CONTINUOUS MODELS OF SUCESSIONS
Introduction. A long-term ecological successions are considered as step-by-step process. The continuous model (model of open Eigen’s hypercycle) is used to describe this process.
The purpose of the paper is to investigate non-linear properties of the system, which define discrete processes that occur in the one.
Results. The multi-dimension case of the model of open Eigen’s hypercycle has been analyzed. It is shown that in many cases the consideration of dynamics of the -dimensional system can be simplified by partial reduction to -dimensional cases.
It is mathematically shown that evolution of system, which is described by the -dimensional model of open Eigen’s hypercycle has, as maximum, stages. Presence and duration of each stage are determined by the size of the ecological niche, as a characteristics of the environment. As an example: if the niche is very small (), there is only one association in the stable state of the ecosystem.
Conclusion. It is shown that the continuous model can describe discrete processes of sucessions. The quasi-discrete dynamics of the system is explained by its bifurcation properties, produced step-by-step changing of the system structure.
Keywords: succession, discrete process, continuous model, Eigen’s hypercycle, bifurcation.
1 Clements F.E. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington D.C.: Publ. Carnegi Inst. 1916. 512p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.56234
2 Aaviksoo K. Simulating Vegetation Dynamics and Land Use in a Mire Landscape Using a Markov Model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, vol. 31, pp. 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)01045-A
3 Logofet D.O., Golubyatnikov L.L., Denisenko E.A. Nonhomogeneous Markov Model of Vegetation Succession: A New Perspective of the Old Paradigm. Izvestiya RAS. Biology Series, 1997, no. 5, pp. 613–622 (in Russian).
4 Isaev A.S., Suhovolsky V.G., Buzykin A.I., Ovchinikov T.M. Successional Processes in Forest Communities: Models of Phase Transitions. Khvojnyje borealnoy zony, 2008,vol. XXV, no. 1–2, pp. 9–16 (in Russian).
5 Connell J.H., Slatyer R.O. Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization. The American Naturalist, 1977, vol. 111, pp. 1119–1144. https://doi.org/10.1086/283241
6 Chakrabarti C.G., Ghosh S., Bhadra S. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics of Lotka-Volterra Ecosystems: Stability and Evolution. Journal of Biological Physics, 1995, vol. 21, pp. 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00700629
7 McNauhghton S.J., Wolf L.L. Dominance and the Niche in Ecological Systems. Science, 1970, vol. 167, pp. 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3915.131
8 Rabotnov A.T. Phytocenology. Moscow: MGU Press. 1992. 352 p. (in Russian).
9 Chernyshenko S.V. Nonlinear Analysis of Forest Ecosystems Dynamics. Dnepropetrovsk: Dnepropetrovsk University Press. 2005. 500 p. (in Russian).
10 Chernyshenko S. V., Ruzich R. V. Bifurcation Model of Successions in Ecosystems. Proceedings of 27th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation ECMS 2013. May 27–30 2013. Alesund, Norway, pp. 767–774. https://doi.org/10.7148/2013-0769
11 Berezich I. S., Zitkov N. P. Methods of Calculations. Vol. 1–2. Moscow: Phys.-math. Liter. Main Press, 1959. 620 p. (in Russian).