Issue 4 (198), article 5
DOI:https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt198.04.078
Cybernetics and Computer Engineering, 2019, 4(198)
KOVALENKO A.S.1, DSc (Medicine), Professor,
Head of the Medical Information Systems Department
e-mail: askov49@gmail.com
MISHCHENKO R.F., PhD (Medicine),
Physician,
e-mail: roman.mishchenko@gmail.com
KOZAK L.M., DSc (Biology), Senior Researcher,
Leading Researcher of the Medical Information Systems Department.
e-mail: lmkozak52@gmail.com
1International Research and Training Centre for Information Technologies and Systems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine,
40, Acad. Glushkov av., Kyiv, 03187, Ukraine
2Khmelnytsky Regional Hospital,
1, Pilotska st., Khmelnytskyi, 29000, Ukraine
TRANSFORMATION OF CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS INTO FHIR STRUCTURES TO ENSURE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE
Introduction. The reform of the medical sector in Ukraine has given impetus to the development of eHealth and, as a consequence, the creation of medical registers systems and specialized medical information systems to support the operation of primary health care etc. One of the strategic directions of the health care system is to find and choose effective methods of managing the quality of care.
The purpose of the paper is to analyze the conditions and opportunities for transformation of the clinical decision support system using standard Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) structures to ensure health care quality control.
Results. The current level of medical information systems development requires the application of the international standard FHIR, which are applied for the exchange of data between different systems of electronic medical records and between different components of the same electronic medical record (EMR) system, for standardization of interoperability.
Uninterrupted improvement model, known as the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA), which consists of four components — planning, executing, testing and improving own process, is considered. The characteristics of the FHIR standard are analyzed and ways of transforming the clinical decision support system based on this standard are identified. The concept of an abstract data node, ensuring terminological compliance, implementation of the Workflow data model, and other functions and tasks of the clinical decision support system are described.
Conclusions. One of the important areas of eHealth development is to implement the information systems for care quality managing based on modern information medical standards. Creation and implementation of effective methods for monitoring (identifying) diagnostic and treatment quality in hospital will foster optimization and increase of their activity efficiency.
The use of the FHIR framework in the creation of information support system for evaluating the care quality enables to improve the data exchange quality and their processing for decision-making.
Keywords: eHealth, FHIR structures, clinical decision support system, health care quality control.
REFERENCES
1 Hynes D.M., Perrin R.A, Rappaport S., Stevens J.M., Demakis J.G. Informatics Resources to Support Health Care Quality Improvement in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. V.11, iss. 5. 2004, pp. 344-350. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1548
2 Campanella P., Lovato E., Marone C., Fallacara L., Mancuso A., Ricciardi W., Specchia M.L. The impact of electronic health records on health carequality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health. 2016. V. 26, no 1, pp. 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv122.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv122
3 Heller B., Kruger M., Loffler M., Mantovani L., Meineke F., Mishchenko R. OncoWorkstation – Ein adaptives Agentensystem fur das Therapiemanagement klinischer Studien. 2002, Berlin.
4 Meineke, F., Mishchenko, R., Mantovani, L., Loffler, M. & Heller, B. Onco-Workstation – ein Konsultations- und Planungswerkzeug zur Unterstutzung der Auswahl und Durchfuhrung von onkologischen Therapiestudien. In: Jahrestagung der GMDS. Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in Medizin und Biologie, 2003.
5 Voronenko Yu., Gorachuk V. Management of quality of medical care: world and domestic models. Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 2012, no. 2-3 (18-19), pp. 64-67. (in Ukranian)
6 Voronenko Yu., Gorachuk V. Methodical approaches to implementation of standardization of organizational technologies in the quality management system of medical care. Ukrainian Medical Journal. 2012, no. 5(91), pp. 108-110. (in Ukranian)
7 Gorachuk V., Bogatir I. Experience in the development and implementation of an information system for monitoring the quality of care. Medical Forum. 2014. no 2. P. 55-59. (in Ukranian)
8 Kovalenko O.S., Kozak L.M., Romanyuk O.A. Digital Medicine Information Technology. Kibernetika i vycislitelnaa tehnika. 2017, 1(187), pp. 69-79. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt187.01.067
9 Rogozinskaya N.S., Kozak L.M. Information support of technology for automated monitoring of the state of public health. Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz, 2013, no. 6, pp. 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-013-9585-1
10 Kozak L.M., Kovalenko O.S., Romanyuk O.A, Antomonov M.Yu. Formation of Information Medical Environment in Different Levels. Proc. SPIE. 11176, Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments. 2019, 6 November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2536412
11 Impact of Heath Information Technology on the Quality of Patient Care. OJNI. V. 19. 2015.
12 Kozak L.M., Kovalenko A.S., Kryvova O.A., Romanyuk O.A. Digital Transformation in Medicine: From Formalized Medical Documents to Information Technologies of Digital Medicine. Kibernetika i vycislitelnaa tehnika. 2018. no. 4(194). P. 61-78. https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt194.04.061
13 Ross D. S., Venkatesh R. Role of Hospital Information Systems in Improving Healthcare Quality in Hospitals. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. v. 9(26). P.1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i26/92686
14 Crosson J.C., Stroebel C., Scott J.G., Stello B., Crabtree B.F. Implementing an Electronic Medical Record in a Family Medicine Practice: Communication, Decision Making, and Conflict.Annals of Family Medicine. 2005. Vol. 3. no. 4. P. 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.326
15 Coiera E., Westbrook J.I., Wyatt J.C. The Safety and Quality of Decision Support Systems. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6745100 (Last accessed: 05.09.2019.)
16 HL7 Messaging Standard Version 2.7. URL: http://www.hl7.org/ implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id?146. (Last accessed: 01.09.2018).
17 Mandel J.C., Kreda D.A., Mandl K.D., Kohane I.S., Ramoni R.B. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperableappsplatformforelectronichealthrecords. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Advance Access. 2016. P.1-10.
18 Version History since DSTU #1 URL: https://build.fhir.org/history.htm (Last accessed:08.08.2019.)
19 How FHIR works and what’s a FHIR resource.URL: https://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/FHIR-Fast-Healthcare-Interoperability-Resources (Last accessed: 08.08.2019.)
20 Bender D, Sartipi K. HL7 FHIR: anagile and REST ful approach to health care information exchange. In IEEE 26th International Symposiumon Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). 2013. P. 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2013.6627810
21 Zhemchugov A.M., Zhemchugov M.K. PDCA Deming cycle. Modern development. Problems of economy and management. 2016. no. 2 (54). P.3-28. (in Russian)
Received 21.08.2019